Meaningful autocomplete still missing

Johannes Stiehler
Random Rant
#Autocomplete
#Search
Cover Image for Meaningful autocomplete still missing
Cover Image for Meaningful autocomplete still missing

Some time ago we blogged about the sad state of search functions on German websites. Newspaper portals in particular have a large amount of high-quality content, but without powerful search, only the latest articles can be found in a useful way.

In this video, we take a look at major publications and how they deal with the issue of search and autocomplete. A spoiler ahead: the situation is unchanged.

For the moment, we limited ourselves to German publications, so the video is also only available in a DE version.

Johannes Stiehler
CO-Founder NEOMO GmbH
Johannes has spent his entire professional career working on software solutions that process, enrich and surface textual information.

There's more where this came from!

Subscribe to our newsletter

If you want to disconnect from the X madness and LinkedIn bubble but still want our content, we are honoured and we got you covered: Our Newsletter will keep you posted on all that is noteworthy.

Please use the form below to subscribe.

NEOMO is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy and will only use your personal data to manage your account and provide the information you request. In order to provide you with the requested content, we need to store and process your personal data. If you consent to us storing your personal data for this purpose, please check the box below.

Follow us for insights, updates and random rants!

Whenever new content is available or something noteworthy is happening in the industry, we've got you covered.

Follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter to get the news and on YouTube for moving pictures.

Sharing is caring

If you like what we have to contribute, please help us get the word out by activating your own network.

More blog posts

EU AI Act: Myth and Reality

The EU AI Act is law —it is not a draft. Many prohibitions are already in effect, with high-risk regulations set to follow starting in 2026/27. This affects not only AI providers but also companies acting as “deployers” (e.g., in recruiting, scoring, and support). In this episode: What is prohibited, what is considered high-risk, what transparency and documentation requirements are coming—and how companies can achieve compliance in a pragmatic way.

Artificial intelligence - technology or strategy?

AI is everywhere—but it’s rarely effective in day-to-day business operations. This episode highlights three common pitfalls: a wait-and-see approach (which leads to shadow AI), a “co-pilot for everyone” strategy with no real impact, and a Center of Excellence disconnected from real-world problems. Instead of treating AI as an ideology, the key is to strike a balance: digitize processes, identify bottlenecks, and use AI to significantly reduce the workload on top performers and scale operations.

Agile or fragile? Why waterfall is simply the better choice for some projects

Agile project management is not an end in itself, but requires clear roles, prioritization, decision-making authority, and a cross-functional environment. Depending on the stability of requirements, compliance and documentation needs, external dependencies, and budget/fixed price constraints, waterfall or hybrid approaches are often more appropriate, and a method-driven “pseudo-agility” can otherwise lead to chaos, scope creep, and cost/schedule risks.